Return‑to‑Work Resume Checker (ATS-Friendly)
Feeling invisible in applications? Return-to-Work Resume Checker — Gaps, Projects & ATS-Safe Framing matters—but it’s not your whole story. We’ll help you fix the ATS basics, express real impact, and turn a file into a compelling signal. At WisGrowth, our goal is simple: help you stop guessing and start moving toward a career that serves your life. We’re your clarity companion—practical, honest, and on your side.
What to do next
- Fix the basics: filetype (PDF), simple layout, standard headings, no tables/columns for core text.
- Quantify impact: action verb + what you did + measurable result.
- Tailor once: pick 1–2 roles, extract keywords, reflect them naturally—don’t stuff.
- Scan with our Honest ATS checker, then fix the top 3 issues.
- Add a 2-line ‘Wins’ section showcasing outcomes, not tasks.
💡 Try this next week: Rewrite one resume bullet with an action verb + measurable outcome.
Why we exist: careers shouldn’t be a guessing game. We give you clarity, honest feedback, and a path you can actually follow.
Will your resume get past Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) and in front of a real recruiter? WisGrowth gives you an honest, recruiter-grade ATS score with specific, practical fixes. We don’t inflate results. If your resume scores 62%, you’ll see exactly why—and how to move it to the 70–80% range quickly.
Our approach blends two realities: first, your document must be cleanly parsed by ATS; second, it must persuade a human with impact and relevance. That’s why our scan checks parsing quality, keyword match to a job description, section structure, action-oriented bullets, readability, and formatting hazards like tables, columns, icons, and images that break parsers.
Human Review Still Matters
Once ATS ranks you near the top, a recruiter skim reads for clarity, credibility, and outcomes. Replace fluffy bullets with measurable results (e.g., “Reduced cloud spend by 22% using rightsizing and auto‑scaling” rather than “Worked on cost optimization”). Our deep analysis add‑on provides examples tailored to your profile—and coaching is available if you want a rapid 15‑minute feedback loop.
Next Steps
Start with a free scan and then pick the most relevant guide below to tailor your resume for your market and role. If you’re mid‑career and pivoting, our mid‑career resume mistakes guide is a great companion. If you’re new to the job market, see our fresher ATS resume checker. Compare improvements using the ATS resume score calculator.
FAQs
- Is this scanner free?
- Yes, you can run a free ATS scan and see your honest score. Unlock the deep report if you want tailored examples and keyword expansions.
- Will a PDF work?
- Text‑based PDFs work great. If parsing fails, upload the DOCX export and try again.
- Do I need a different resume for every job?
- Not a full rewrite—just tune the headline, skills, and a few bullets to mirror the job description.
- What score should I target?
- 70%+ is a solid benchmark. Many candidates hit it after 1–2 quick edits from the recommendations.
Quick Checklist Before You Apply
- Headline aligned: Your title mirrors the role (e.g., “Senior Product Manager” not “Product Ninja”).
- Keywords present: Core skills from the job description appear naturally in bullets and skills.
- Impact bullets: Use numbers (%, $, time saved) and outcomes (“reduced churn by 12%”).
- Simple formatting: No tables/columns/icons that hide text from ATS.
- Readable layout: 10–12pt font, clear section headings, adequate spacing.
Common Mistakes That Lower Your ATS Score
From our Search Console data, many people look for ATS friendly resume, resume score calculator, and job description match because they’ve been rejected silently. Avoid these pitfalls:
- Keyword stuffing: Repeating words without context triggers a poor readability signal.
- Overly creative titles: “Growth Wizard” won’t match common recruiter search terms.
- Graphics-over-text: Skill bars and icons look nice but hide content from parsers.
- PDF scans: Scanned images of resumes are unreadable—export a text‑based PDF instead.
Suggested Structure
Try this simple sequence which consistently parses well: Header (name, email, phone, city/region, LinkedIn) → Professional Summary (2–3 lines, role‑aligned keywords) → Skills (grouped, not a tag cloud) → Experience (impact bullets) → Education → Certifications or Projects.